1var data = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6];
2
3// traditional for loop
4for(let i=0; i<=data.length; i++) {
5  console.log(data[i])  // 1 2 3 4 5 6
6}
7
8// using for...of
9for(let i of data) {
10	console.log(i) // 1 2 3 4 5 6
11}
12
13// using for...in
14for(let i in data) {
15  	console.log(i) // Prints indices for array elements
16	console.log(data[i]) // 1 2 3 4 5 6
17}
18
19// using forEach
20data.forEach((i) => {
21  console.log(i) // 1 2 3 4 5 6
22})
23// NOTE ->  forEach method is about 95% slower than the traditional for loop
24
25// using map
26data.map((i) => {
27  console.log(i) // 1 2 3 4 5 6
28})

1let array = ['Item 1', 'Item 2', 'Item 3'];
2
3// Here's 4 different ways
4for (let index = 0; index < array.length; index++) {
5  console.log(array[index]);
6}
7
8for (let index in array) {
9  console.log(array[index]);
10}
11
12for (let value of array) {
13  console.log(value); // Will log each value
14}
15
16array.forEach((value, index) => {
17  console.log(index); // Will log each index
18  console.log(value); // Will log each value
19});

1var colors = ["red","blue","green"];
2for (var i = 0; i < colors.length; i++) {
3    console.log(colors[i]);
4}

1var colors = ["red","blue","green"];
2colors.forEach(function(color) {
3  console.log(color);
4});

1const array = ["one", "two", "three"]
2array.forEach(function (item, index) {
3  console.log(item, index);
4});

1var arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8];
2
3// Uses the usual "for" loop to iterate
4for(var i= 0, l = arr.length; i< l; i++){
5	console.log(arr[i]);
6}
7
8console.log("========================");
9
10//Uses forEach to iterate
11arr.forEach(function(item,index){
12	console.log(item);
13});